Scott Bessent, the 79th U.S. Treasury Secretary, made headlines by claiming he is a “soybean farmer” who understands the struggles of the agricultural community. But is the former billionaire hedge fund manager and global currency trader truly getting his hands dirty? The answer depends entirely on how you define the word “farmer.
Let’s unpack the $25 million question at the heart of the ethics debate.
The Landlord vs. Operator: Who’s Doing the Work?
The biggest point of contention is the difference between owning the land and operating the farm.
- Bessent’s Role: Secretary Bessent owns a substantial portfolio of North Dakota corn and soybean farmland, valued up to $25 million, through his investment entity, High Plains Acres LLP. He acts as the landlord for these acres.
- The Working Farmers: The day-to-day operation—planting the seeds, running the machinery, managing the crop cycle, and taking the primary risk of a poor harvest—is handled by tenant farmers who lease the land from Bessent’s partnership.
For most people, a “farmer” is the person who does the labor and manages the complex logistics of the crop. By that definition, Bessent is clearly an investor and landlord, not a farmer.
The Money Trail: Why Crop Prices Matter to Bessent
If he doesn’t operate the land, why does Bessent feel justified in using the title? It comes down to his contract and his pocketbook.
- Revenue-Sharing: Bessent’s rental income (which totals between $100,001 and $1 million per year) is not a simple, fixed cash payment. It is structured through a revenue-sharing agreement that is directly tied to the market price and yield of the corn and soybeans produced.
- Financial Stake: When the market price for soybeans falls (for instance, due to Chinese tariffs), Bessent’s personal rental income drops. His claim that he has “felt this pain too” is based on this direct, financial stake in the outcome of the commodity market.
This arrangement means he is financially vested in the health of the U.S. agricultural economy, even though he is not operating the tractor.
The Conflict of Interest: Trading Policy for Profit
The ethical problem isn’t the farming itself; it’s the convergence of his investment with his political power:
- Setting Policy: As Treasury Secretary, Bessent is a key negotiator in international trade and tariff policy, particularly with major soybean buyers like China.
- Private Gain: Any policy decision he makes that positively affects the price of soybeans (such as reducing tariffs or opening new markets) directly increases the rent and overall value of his privately held North Dakota farmland.
This creates a textbook conflict of interest, which is why he was required to sell the asset (divest) upon taking office.
🧠Bottom Line
Is Scott Bessent a farmer? No, in the traditional sense of operating a farm. He is a landlord and an investor.
Is he financially tied to the outcome of U.S. farming? Absolutely. His unique revenue-sharing lease structure ensures that his personal wealth fluctuates with the very commodity prices his department has the power to influence. The claim serves less as a statement of occupation and more as a political justification for having a financial stake in America’s agricultural success.
Search Observations: I went entirely with the Gemini response. The Copilot and ChatGPT responses were superficial, and the DeepSeek provide even less information than the others.
Leave a Reply